Product walkthroughs

See stronger assessment
workflows in action.

Watch how each Auto Assessments Pty Ltd product supports more structured review activity for Australian RTOs. Every tool keeps qualified assessors in control of final decisions while helping teams identify what needs closer attention.

Campaign focus · Before delivery

Pre-Validation Report

Review assessment evidence, mapping, and unit requirements before delivery to identify gaps early. The Pre-Validation Report helps trainers, instructional designers, and compliance teams focus validation activity on missing evidence, weak task coverage, and unclear links to unit requirements.

$149 per Pre-Validation Report

Register your interest for the Pre-Validation Report. Service launching soon; expected turnaround is approximately 1 hour once available.

  • Identify potential evidence and mapping gaps before learners receive the tool.
  • Support more consistent validation documentation and continuous improvement.
  • Expect delivery in approximately 1 hour after launch, subject to scope and materials received.
  • Build confidence in assessment materials without replacing professional judgement.
Register your interest now. When the service launches, we will confirm scope and provide instructions for sharing your assessment materials.

Compliance consultants can ask about volume licensing for multiple reports.

Register interest

Turnaround overview (expected at launch)

Offer summary

Planned $149 offer at launch

  • Pre-delivery review of submitted evidence and mapping.
  • Clear gap and follow-up points for your team.
  • Expected delivery in approximately 1 hour, subject to scope and complete materials.
  • Output designed to support internal validation activity.

Prepare your materials

What to prepare

For a useful Pre-Validation Report, we expect the relevant assessor and student assessment materials, including instructions, benchmarks, evidence requirements, assessment conditions, decision rules, mapping and result records.

  • Assessor pack: assessment guide, benchmarks, observation tools, decision rules, mapping and assessor instructions.
  • Student pack: unit information, task instructions, evidence requirements, templates, assessment conditions and declarations.
  • Supporting documents: version history, reasonable adjustment guidance and reassessment rules.

Missing or incomplete materials may limit the scope of the report. We will identify submission gaps before commencing the review.

After upload · Student review

Student Submission Grading Report

Review submitted learner evidence against unit requirements and give assessors structured information before outcomes are confirmed. It helps teams work through evidence more consistently while directing attention to incomplete coverage and matters that require closer professional judgement.

  • Review learner evidence against unit requirements and marking guidance.
  • Highlight incomplete coverage and areas for assessor follow-up.
  • Support moderation conversations with a clearer evidence trail.
Discuss the Grading Report

Mixed delivery · Paper and digital

Handwritten Assessments

Bring paper-based submissions into the same review workflow as digital assessments. This supports RTOs delivering practical, classroom, workshop, or regional training where handwritten evidence remains part of the learner journey.

  • Bring paper and digital learner evidence into one review process.
  • Reduce fragmentation across mixed delivery models.
  • Keep assessment records easier to manage and review.
Discuss Handwritten Assessments

Submission review · Integrity indicators

AI & Plagiarism Detection

Surface relevant integrity indicators so assessors can make informed, evidence-based follow-up decisions. The report brings together potential plagiarism, AI-generated content, generative logs, version control, and feedback quality for closer review where needed.

  • Move beyond a single similarity score when reviewing authenticity.
  • Provide a clearer basis for fair assessor follow-up conversations.
  • Support transparent internal integrity review processes.
Discuss AI & Plagiarism Detection

Additional platform capabilities

Extend your assessment workflow.

Auto-Marking

Help review written and practical submissions against unit marking criteria, providing structured feedback for assessor consideration.

Moodle Integration (coming soon)

Connect Moodle with your assessment workflow to help streamline submission review and assessor follow-up.

Consistent Review

Apply defined criteria with assessor oversight to support fair, transparent outcomes across cohorts.